Court tells Hawaii officials to explain Obama's birth records

For those who have been following the eligibility "birther" issue, the latest developments are:

Show cause' hearing will determine why subpoena rejected

Article by Jerome R. Corsi

California attorney Orly Taitz today secured an order from United States District Court Magistrate Judge Richard L. Puglisi demanding representatives of the Hawaii Department of Health appear in federal court Sept. 14 to show why Taitz should be prevented from seeing whatever original 1961 documents the agency has on record regarding Barack Obama's birth.

Taitz returned to federal court in Honolulu today after Hawaii DOH officials presented her with a letter refusing to comply with her subpoena on grounds that Hawaii privacy laws prevented officials from releasing Obama birth records to the public.

"It's ridiculous," Taitz told WND.

Read the complete article.

Anyone with a small knowledge of Court Rules and Procedure knows this action by the State of Hawaii officials to deny a Federal Court subpoena is tantamount to a 'Contempt of Court Ruling'
This action additionally lends credence to the allegations of ineligibility due to not complying with the Constitutional requirement of "natural born" which HAS BEEN DEFINED by numerous Federal court rulings over the past 150 years in several Supreme Court cases ..   [Defined as: both parents are native born citizens, child is born in the defined borders of the United States or Territories, of parents serving in the military, diplomatic service, ETAL with exceptions for US citizens on vacation outside the US, child of a native born citizen and a permanent resident align of 5 years or more.] 

The adage 'actions speak louder than words' leads a reasonable person to the thought and questions of:

1. Why has there been such a concerted effort to 'hide' this information?
2. Why has this become such an issue?
3. Why did the State Election Officers NOT verify the eligibility in the first place which is required by State Law?
4. Why has not one of these State Election Officials been willing to review the issue openly to settle the debate?
5. Why is the State of Hawaii not willing to provide information which is of public record and can be released under a FOIA request?  [what is the State trying to hide?]
6. If BHO was ADOPTED BY SATORO,  where is the official record filed of this adoption [which of itself invalidates any eligibility]?
7. Why has there been such a concerted effort to keep this information 'hidden' even when the Democratic Party adherents were willing to attack then Candidate, Senator John McCain because he was born in the Canal Zone of two American Citizens, one who was on active military duty which automatically provides special exceptions for any children born during that assignment , with the Canal Zone at that time being a territorial entity of the US?
8. Why would the White House release such a blatantly and openly fraudulent document to represent the official Long Form Birth Certificate?  [I was born during this time frame.. ALL Birth Certificates of this era are stored on microfiche, printing one gives you a negative style copy, NEVER printed on 'safety paper' and it DOES NOT HAVE a book binder fold in the reproduction!]
9. Why so many unanswered questions without definitive answers? just evasive actions to keep from any questions being answered?

The cumulative collection of all the denials and evasive actions, truly makes a logical everyday person wonder, "why all the fuss, why not just produce the document and be done with it.. "

Or is the reason for all this fuss because the truth is  - Barrack Hussein Obama IS NOT ELIGIBLE to hold the office of President, it was ASSUMED he was eligible because he was an elected Senator [qualifications for holding the office of Senator DOES NOT require you to be "natural born citizen"], A number of State Election Officials and other politician's 'careers' would go down the drain if this issue is proven because they in their official capacity DID NOT assert complete "due diligence" in verifying qualification documents, and the ramifications of what a falsely elected 'President' would have on our governmental system..

To this citizen,  the total evidence speaks of a concerted and coordinated conspiratorial effort to 'scam' the citizenry of the US into believing a falsehood and for what reason?

Historical Reminder.. History DOES REPEAT!!

The following was sent to me by an older cousin, Charles Bowen

If you are a student of History, you will strongly recognize the parallel between the two administrations.. It has been soundly PROVEN,  the economic policies of the early Roosevelt Administration profoundly acerbated the depressionary economy with only the onset of World War II being the stimulus which brought our country out of that economic state.  The US Economy, can not afford another 4 years of the present administration's "blundering in the dark" lack of definitive leadership and economic policies which are proving to be useless and ineffective as the early efforts of the Roosevelt Administration.

The Federal Government can not create jobs, it CAN create a productive environment by getting out of the way, removing hindering regulations, rescinding oppressive EPA rules which do not make any common sense, repeal or drastically revise the so called Patient Affordable Health Care Act A.K.A. OBAMACARE which is based on Massachusetts State Health care [check out recent information of the TRUE COST of this program which is 4x original predictions],  Streamline processes, review effectiveness of and consolidate duplicate agencies within the bureaucracy of the Federal sector allowing the full faith and strength of the US Capitalism to revitalize into full steam ahead optimism.  Reduction of the massive amount of  out of control overspending  with a focus on overall dept reduction,   then and only then will our depressed economy have the confidence to affect any recovery and begin to be productive to the level of strength which is needed across ALL sectors of the economy.

The rebuilding and strengthening begins from bottom up, not top down.

Obama's 'Official" Birth Certificate

WELL,.. 

I find it quite convenient the Obama camp has suddenly released what is supposed to be a copy of his Long Form Birth Certificate.. especially after spending over 2 Million to keep not only this document but so many other vitae documents from the public eye..  there has been

TOO MUCH SMOKE SCREEN CREATED FOR THERE NOT TO HAVE BEEN A FIRE OF TRUTH TO THE ALLEGATIONS!!

COULD this be because the managers are doing their best to detract from the real issue??  

COULD it be their is tooo much heat in the kitchen or someone is getting too close to the unvarnished truth of his birth??

COULD it be he is attempting to take this 'problem' out of the kettle so he is not disqualified in the 2012 Presidential race let alone being found ineligible to have held the office in the first place, a genuinely blatant political move...

You decide,.. Watch this video from U-Tube.. I can vouch for how easy it is to alter documents with today's computers.. anyone with a little knowledge of graphic programs, access to the proper document forms,.. and so on can generate such a document.. find your own Birth Certificate and compare..

ALSO, the requests for such documents are closely guarded under identity theft and privacy statutes,  not just anybody can 'walk in' and request a document such as this without proper ID.. also the request is limited to certain persons.. 

The Claim of Obama could not obtain a copy 'by law' is just a farce and false claim because the principal after the age of majority, parents or a personally authorized agent are the only entities who can receive a copy of a document such as this.. 

Also consider EVERY STATE, has a provision for delayed birth registration or correction  of Birth Certificates.. 

Fairly simple process.. generally all it takes is two person swearing an affidavit who are purported to have been in attendance at your birth or with personal knowledge or supporting legalistic documents of AT LEAST 5 years of age in Arkansas to make corrections on your birth certificate.

Do not let this bogus document change your opinion or belief at this time..

Gov. Mike Beebe, AG Dustin McDaniel & Assistant AG Joe Cordi needs to honor their Oath plus responsibility!!

Arkansas Constitution of 1874
Article 19.
Miscellaneous Provisions.

20. Oath of office.

Senators and Representatives, and all judicial and executive, State and county officers, and all other officers, both civil and military, before entering on the duties of their respective offices, shall take and subscribe to the following oath of affirmation:  [this is a sworn oath]

"I, ________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Arkansas, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of ________, upon which I am now about to enter."



Signed Copies of the Affirmation and Attestation of the above Oath of Office is filed with the Secretary of State and is/was administered by the Chief Supreme Court Justice of the State of Arkansas.

Arkansas Code Annotated
Chapter 21
Uniform Law To Oppose Federal Encroachment On State Rights

25-21-101. Study of existing federal legislation.
25-21-102. Study of proposed federal legislation.
25-21-103. Investigation of federal legislation on request of Senators or Representatives.
25-21-104. Appointment of Deputy or Assistant Attorney General.
25-21-105. Membership in interstate organization.
25-21-106. Title.

25-21-101. Study of existing federal legislation.

In order to secure concerted action among the states to oppose federal encroachments upon the state powers, and to expedite the proper execution of the responsibility of the government in the war effort, it shall be the duty of the Attorney General to cooperate with the attorneys general of other cooperating states in making a study of existing federal legislation to determine whether, by the establishment of federal bureaus, boards, or commissions, or otherwise, such legislation has resulted in objectionable or harmful encroachments upon the normal field of state functions and powers, and, except during the war and insofar as the legislation is reasonably related to the conduct of the war to call to the attention of this state's Senators and Representatives in Congress all legislation which, in his opinion, is objectionable or harmful in this respect. He shall also furnish each such Senator and Representative a written statement of the reasons for his belief that such legislation is objectionable or harmful to the state, together with his suggestions for appropriate congressional legislation to remedy same.

History. Acts 1943, No. 166, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 5-401.

25-21-102. Study of proposed federal legislation.

It shall also be the duty of the Attorney General to likewise cooperate with such other attorneys general in making studies and examinations of all now pending or hereafter proposed congressional legislation to determine whether the same may result in federal encroachments into the normal field of state legislation or state functions, or whether same is harmful or beneficial to the interests of the state or its citizens, and to advise the Senators and Representatives in writing of his opinion and views with respect thereto, together with his reasons therefor; and to suggest any amendments to any such pending or proposed legislation which the Attorney General deems appropriate or necessary to protect the interests of the state and its citizens.

History. Acts 1943, No. 166, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 5-402.

25-21-103. Investigation of federal legislation on request of Senators or Representatives.

The Attorney General shall also make any reasonable or appropriate investigation or study of any existing or proposed federal legislation to determine its effect upon the state and its citizens whenever he is requested so to do by any of this state's Senators or Representatives in Congress and report the result of such investigation or study.

History. Acts 1943, No. 166, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 5-403.

25-21-104. Appointment of Deputy or Assistant Attorney General.

The Attorney General shall appoint a Deputy or Assistant Attorney General whose principal duty shall be to assist in the performance of the duties imposed by this chapter. The
compensation of the Deputy or Assistant shall be paid out of the appropriation for the Attorney General's Office contained in the general appropriation act.
History. Acts 1943, No. 166, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 5-404.

25-21-105. Membership in interstate organization.

The Attorney General and/or his said Deputy or Assistant is authorized to become a member of an organization now existing or hereafter formed, the membership consisting of the attorneys general of the various states, and/or their deputies or assistants, and the purpose of said organization being to bring about the joint or concerted action of said states to preserve in the states their normal powers, obligations, and functions, as provided by the Constitution of the United States. The Attorney General is authorized to pay, out of the bill of appropriations for conducting his office, this state's fair part or proportion of any proper expenses incurred by said organization in furtherance of the purposes of this chapter.

History. Acts 1943, No. 166, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 5-405.

25-21-106. Title.

This chapter may be cited as the “Uniform Law to Oppose Federal Encroachments”.
History. Acts 1943, No. 166, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 5-406.

Article 15.
Impeachment and Address.

     1. Officers subject to impeachment - Grounds.

The Governor and all State officers, Judges of the Supreme and Circuit Courts, Chancellors and Prosecuting Attorneys, shall be liable to impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors, and gross misconduct in office; but the judgment shall go no further than removal from office and disqualification to hold any office of honor, trust or profit under this State. An impeachment, whether successful or not, shall be no bar to an indictment.

      2. Impeachment by House - Trial by Senate - Presiding officer. 

The House of Representatives shall have the sole power of impeachment. All impeachments shall be tried by the Senate. When sitting for that purpose, the Senators shall be upon oath or affirmation; no person shall be convicted without the concurrence of two-thirds of the members thereof. The Chief Justice shall preside, unless he is impeached or otherwise disqualified, when the Senate shall select a presiding officer.

      3. Officers removable by Governor upon address.  

The governor, upon the joint address of two-thirds of all the members elected to each House of the General Assembly, for good cause, may remove the Auditor, Treasurer, Secretary of State, Attorney-General, Judges of the Supreme and Circuit Courts, Chancellors and Prosecuting Attorneys.

After reading this information, I believe any reasonalbe person will conclude that both our Governor and AG are in violation of several offenses as defined within the above!!  This also includes the Assistant AG as well

Please Share this info with as many others in Arkansas as you can -
Officers of the Court, YOU HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO ACT!!