For those who have been following the eligibility "birther" issue, the latest developments are:
Show cause' hearing will determine why subpoena rejected
Article by Jerome R. Corsi
California attorney Orly Taitz today secured an order from United States District Court Magistrate Judge Richard L. Puglisi demanding representatives of the Hawaii Department of Health appear in federal court Sept. 14 to show why Taitz should be prevented from seeing whatever original 1961 documents the agency has on record regarding Barack Obama's birth.
Taitz returned to federal court in Honolulu today after Hawaii DOH officials presented her with a letter refusing to comply with her subpoena on grounds that Hawaii privacy laws prevented officials from releasing Obama birth records to the public.
"It's ridiculous," Taitz told WND.
Anyone with a small knowledge of Court Rules and Procedure knows this action by the State of Hawaii officials to deny a Federal Court subpoena is tantamount to a 'Contempt of Court Ruling'
This action additionally lends credence to the allegations of ineligibility due to not complying with the Constitutional requirement of "natural born" which HAS BEEN DEFINED by numerous Federal court rulings over the past 150 years in several Supreme Court cases .. [Defined as: both parents are native born citizens, child is born in the defined borders of the United States or Territories, of parents serving in the military, diplomatic service, ETAL with exceptions for US citizens on vacation outside the US, child of a native born citizen and a permanent resident align of 5 years or more.]
The adage 'actions speak louder than words' leads a reasonable person to the thought and questions of:
- Why has there been such a concerted effort to 'hide' this information?
- Why has this become such an issue?
- Why did the State Election Officers NOT verify the eligibility in the first place which is required by State Law?
- Why has not one of these State Election Officials been willing to review the issue openly to settle the debate?
- Why is the State of Hawaii not willing to provide information which is of public record and can be released under a FOIA request? [what is the State trying to hide?]
- If BHO was ADOPTED BY SATORO, where is the official record filed of this adoption [which of itself invalidates any eligibility]?
- Why has there been such a concerted effort to keep this information 'hidden' even when the Democratic Party adherents were willing to attack then Candidate, Senator John McCain because he was born in the Canal Zone of two American Citizens, one who was on active military duty which automatically provides special exceptions for any children born during that assignment , with the Canal Zone at that time being a territorial entity of the US?
- Why would the White House release such a blatantly and openly fraudulent document to represent the official Long Form Birth Certificate? [I was born during this time frame.. ALL Birth Certificates of this era are stored on microfiche, printing one gives you a negative style copy, NEVER printed on 'safety paper' and it DOES NOT HAVE a book binder fold in the reproduction!]
- Why so many unanswered questions without definitive answers? just evasive actions to keep from any questions being answered?
Or is the reason for all this fuss because the truth is - Barrack Hussein Obama IS NOT ELIGIBLE to hold the office of President, it was ASSUMED he was eligible because he was an elected Senator [qualifications for holding the office of Senator DOES NOT require you to be "natural born citizen"], A number of State Election Officials and other politician's 'careers' would go down the drain if this issue is proven because they in their official capacity DID NOT assert complete "due diligence" in verifying qualification documents, and the ramifications of what a falsely elected 'President' would have on our governmental system..
To this citizen, the total evidence speaks of a concerted and coordinated conspiratorial effort to 'scam' the citizenry of the US into believing a falsehood and for what reason?